Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
examples of internal and external validity
The correlation coefficient, plus graphical methods to verify the validity of a linear relationship (which is what the correlation coefficient measures), and the appropriate tests of the statisitical significance of the correlation coefficient.
Causal validity is also referred to as internal validity. It refers to how well experiments are done and what we can infer from those results.
The difference between internal and external validity is in their nature. Internal validity indicates if a study depicts relation between two variables. External validity on the other hand generalizes the study of the variables.
This question doesn't make sense the way it is written - perhaps it is referring to other questions in your text. Please clarify and resubmit your question.
evaluate the text.
scientific method
evaluate the text.
A critical reader is someone who approaches written material with an analytical and questioning mindset. They evaluate the content for accuracy, validity, bias, and underlying assumptions, and often engage in a process of reflection and critique to fully understand and interpret the text.
Peer reviewers for journals evaluate the quality and validity of research submissions based on criteria such as the originality of the research, the clarity of the methodology, the significance of the findings, the accuracy of the data analysis, and the adherence to ethical standards in research.
Reviewers for journals evaluate the quality and validity of submitted research articles based on criteria such as the originality of the research, the soundness of the methodology used, the clarity of the writing, the significance of the findings, and the adherence to ethical standards in research.
A valid conclusion is when your conclusion is written using the text you have and get it right.
One way to evaluate the effectiveness of researching information from a text is by assessing the relevance and accuracy of the information to your research question or topic. You can also consider the credibility of the sources cited in the text and evaluate how well the information supports your arguments or conclusions. Additionally, examining the depth and breadth of the information presented in the text can help you gauge its effectiveness for your research purposes.
It is best not to do the two different evaluations at once. First check spelling and grammar, next do all proofreading, and last evaluate the text. Never try all at once.
Satirical websites or sources with a known history of spreading misinformation would generally have the least validity. It's important to critically evaluate the credibility and reliability of sources before accepting the information as true.
Validity refers to the accuracy of a measure in assessing what it intends to measure, while reliability refers to the consistency of the measure. Establishing validity involves multiple factors such as construct validity, content validity, and criterion validity, making it more complex than evaluating reliability. It requires more evidence and validation processes to ensure that the measure is actually measuring what it is supposed to.
In order to be able to evaluate a text