Using a radical (square root) bar. I can't get one on the screen, but I'm sure you know what they look like.
Example: fractional exponents can be rewritten in radical form: x2/3 means the cube root of (x2) ... write a radical with an index number 3 to show cube root and the quantity x2 is inside the radical.
Any fractional exponent can be done the same way. The denominator of the fractional exponent becomes the index of the radical, but the numerator stays as a whole number exponent in the radical.
when there is no radical in the denominator
To write ( x^{35} ) in radical form, you can express it as ( (x^{35})^{1} ), which is equivalent to ( \sqrt[1]{x^{35}} ). However, to simplify this further, you can also express it as ( \sqrt[35]{x^{35 \cdot 35}} ) or ( \sqrt[35]{x^{35}} ) raised to the 35th power. Thus, the most straightforward representation is ( (x^{35})^{1} ) or simply ( x^{35} ) itself, as it doesn't require a radical for further simplification.
You can't simplify it more in radical form
71 is a prime number, so there is no simpler form of radical 71 than radical 71.
To simplify 388 in radical form, we first factor it into its prime factors: (388 = 4 \times 97). The square root of 4 is 2, so we can express this as (\sqrt{388} = \sqrt{4 \times 97} = \sqrt{4} \times \sqrt{97} = 2\sqrt{97}). Thus, the simplified radical form of 388 is (2\sqrt{97}).
Well, let's take a moment to appreciate the beauty of numbers. If we want to express 11.31 in radical form, we can write it as √127. Every number has its own unique charm, just like every tree in a painting adds to the beauty of the whole picture.
The answer is: radical 99. I can't type the square-root symbol, but that is what you use. It's something like this: ____ \/ 99 This is radical 99.
3√2 is already in it's simplest form, but if you want to express it as a single radical, it would be: 3√2 = √(32)√2 = √(32 * 2) = √(9 * 2) = √18
2.018606997in radical form??
294 is an integer and there is no sensible radical form for it.
2i radical 5 * * * * * No. it is ± i*radical(25) which is ± 5i. Not sure why the answer is requireed in radical form.
when there is no radical in the denominator
That IS the simplest radical form.
48 does not need to be put in radical form. But, it can be: √2304
To write ( x^{35} ) in radical form, you can express it as ( (x^{35})^{1} ), which is equivalent to ( \sqrt[1]{x^{35}} ). However, to simplify this further, you can also express it as ( \sqrt[35]{x^{35 \cdot 35}} ) or ( \sqrt[35]{x^{35}} ) raised to the 35th power. Thus, the most straightforward representation is ( (x^{35})^{1} ) or simply ( x^{35} ) itself, as it doesn't require a radical for further simplification.
You can't simplify it more in radical form
71 is a prime number, so there is no simpler form of radical 71 than radical 71.