One way to estimate the square root of a number is by iteration. This entails making a guess at the answer and then improving on it. Repeating the procedure should lead to a better estimate at each stage. One such is the Newton-Raphson method.
If you want to find the square root of k, define f(x) = x^2 – k. Then finding the square root of k is equivalent to solving f(x) = 0.
Let f’(x) = 2x. This is the derivative of f(x) but you do not need to know that to use the N-R method.
Start with x0 as the first guess. Then let xn+1 = xn - f(xn)/f’(xn) for n = 0, 1, 2, … Provided you made a reasonable choice for the starting point, the iteration will very quickly converge to the true answer. It works even if your first guess is not so good:
Suppose you start with x0 = 5 (a pretty poor choice since 5^2 is 25, which is nowhere near 7).
Even so, x3 = 2.2362512515, which is less than 0.01% from the true value. Finally, remember that the negative value is also a square root.
The square roots of 163 are irrational.
The square roots of 84 are irrational.
you can't FIGURE OUT THE SQUARE OF THE IRRATIONAL NUMBER
No.
Yes
The square roots are irrational.
The square roots of 50 are irrational.
The square roots of 163 are irrational.
The square roots of 84 are irrational.
you can't FIGURE OUT THE SQUARE OF THE IRRATIONAL NUMBER
No. Square root of 9=3. 3=3/1. Therefore not all square roots are irrational
No.
Yes
The square roots are irrational.
No. The square roots of perfect squares are rational.
The square roots of three are examples of irrational numbers.
Most of them are.