answersLogoWhite

0

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explained_sum_of_squares

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

BlakeBlake
As your older brother, I've been where you are—maybe not exactly, but close enough.
Chat with Blake
ProfessorProfessor
I will give you the most educated answer.
Chat with Professor
JudyJudy
Simplicity is my specialty.
Chat with Judy

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How do you get the sums of squares?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

What two square numbers total 21?

There is no pair of perfect squares that sums to 21. And the question is pointless if it is not about perfect squares because in that case there are infinitely many answers.There is no pair of perfect squares that sums to 21. And the question is pointless if it is not about perfect squares because in that case there are infinitely many answers.There is no pair of perfect squares that sums to 21. And the question is pointless if it is not about perfect squares because in that case there are infinitely many answers.There is no pair of perfect squares that sums to 21. And the question is pointless if it is not about perfect squares because in that case there are infinitely many answers.


Difference between the sum of the squares and the square of the sums of n numbers?

Difference between the sum of the squares and the square of the sums of n numbers?Read more:Difference_between_the_sum_of_the_squares_and_the_square_of_the_sums_of_n_numbers


When we use f distribution?

When comparing the sums of squares of normal variates.


When using the least squares method should the column of residuals always sums to zero?

Yes.


Can you write every integer as the sum of two nonzero perfect squares?

No.First of all, you can't write negative numbers as sums of perfect squares at all - since all perfect squares are positive.Second, for natural numbers (1, 2, 3...) you may need up to 4 perfect squares: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange's_four-square_theoremNo.First of all, you can't write negative numbers as sums of perfect squares at all - since all perfect squares are positive.Second, for natural numbers (1, 2, 3...) you may need up to 4 perfect squares: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange's_four-square_theoremNo.First of all, you can't write negative numbers as sums of perfect squares at all - since all perfect squares are positive.Second, for natural numbers (1, 2, 3...) you may need up to 4 perfect squares: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange's_four-square_theoremNo.First of all, you can't write negative numbers as sums of perfect squares at all - since all perfect squares are positive.Second, for natural numbers (1, 2, 3...) you may need up to 4 perfect squares: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange's_four-square_theorem