400 200,2 100,2,2 50,2,2,2 25,2,2,2,2 5,5,2,2,2,2
The factor tree is as follows: 114 57,2 19,3,2
Since 61 is already prime, a factor tree is not necessary. The prime factorization of 51 is 3 x 17, which wouldn't make much of a tree. More like a factor shrub.
119 7,17
question:make a factor tree for 36. 6 to the fifth power 6to the fifther power time 6
400 200,2 100,2,2 50,2,2,2 25,2,2,2,2 5,5,2,2,2,2
400 200,2 100,2,2 50,2,2,2 25,2,2,2,2 5,5,2,2,2,2
400 200,2 100,2,2 50,2,2,2 25,2,2,2,2 5,5,2,2,2,2
400 200,2 100,2,2 50,2,2,2 25,2,2,2,2 5,5,2,2,2,2
Use a factor tree. 400 200,2 100,2,2 50,2,2,2 25,2,2,2,2 5,5,2,2,2,2
The factor tree is as follows: 114 57,2 19,3,2
no
Oh, dude, making a factor tree for 7 is like, super easy. You just start with 7 at the top, and then realize that 7 is a prime number, so it only has 1 and 7 as factors. So, your factor tree is basically just a stick with 7 at the top. Voilà!
No.
We generally don't do factor trees of negative numbers, since factor trees are designed to obtain the prime factorization and negative numbers don't have prime factorizations. Here's 400: 400 200,2 100,2,2 50,2,2,2 25,2,2,2,2 5,5,2,2,2,2
yes
991 is already prime. No tree is required.