It is simply 163.0
It is: 134/163 times 100 = 82.21% rounded to two decimal places
163% is 1.63
Rounded to two decimal places, 163 centimetres is equal to 163 / 2.54 = 64.17 inches. There are 12 inches in one foot, therefore, this is equal to 5 feet 4.17 inches.
When your doing an addition/subtraction problem in chemistry the significant figures has to do with LEAST accurate decimal place. How do you know which one is the least ACCURATE? Think of it this way: the more numbers you have following a decimal, the MORE accurate it is. And likewise, the fewer numbers following the decimal, the least it is accurate. Look at 2.00 + 3.1 + 4.175 See how the least accurate decimal place is tenths in 3.1? Therefore your final anwer ends in 9.3. With multiplication and division, you count the total sig figs in each value and then round the final answer to that number of sig figs. Example: 8.965x18.2= 163.163 (without sig figs) The number with the least amount of sig figs is 18.2 (3 sig figs). So you would round 163.163 to simply 163. Does that make sense?
It is: 163/1000 = 0.163 as a decimal
As a decimal 163/1000 = 0.163
1 is in the hundreds place. 5 is in the tens place. 3 is in the units place (the ones place in America).Therefore, when rounded to the nearest tens place it is 150
It is simply 163.0
It is: 134/163 times 100 = 82.21% rounded to two decimal places
163% is 1.63
163 rounded to the nearest tens place is 160.
It is 0001 0110 0011.
Rounded to two decimal places, 163 centimetres is equal to 163 / 2.54 = 64.17 inches. There are 12 inches in one foot, therefore, this is equal to 5 feet 4.17 inches.
Jeopardy - 1984 Ultimate Tournament of Champions Round 2 Game 6 21-163 was released on: USA: 20 April 2005
Matinee Theatre - 1955 A Safe Place 1-163 was released on: USA: 18 June 1956
When your doing an addition/subtraction problem in chemistry the significant figures has to do with LEAST accurate decimal place. How do you know which one is the least ACCURATE? Think of it this way: the more numbers you have following a decimal, the MORE accurate it is. And likewise, the fewer numbers following the decimal, the least it is accurate. Look at 2.00 + 3.1 + 4.175 See how the least accurate decimal place is tenths in 3.1? Therefore your final anwer ends in 9.3. With multiplication and division, you count the total sig figs in each value and then round the final answer to that number of sig figs. Example: 8.965x18.2= 163.163 (without sig figs) The number with the least amount of sig figs is 18.2 (3 sig figs). So you would round 163.163 to simply 163. Does that make sense?