I assume you mean covariance matrix and I assume that you are familiar with the definition:
C = E[(X-u)(X-u)T]
where X is a random vector and u = E(X) is the mean
The definition of non-negative definite is:
xTCx ≥ 0 for any vector x Є R
So is xTE[(X-u)(X-u)T]x ≥ 0?
Then, from one of the covariance properties:
E[(xT(X-u))((X-u)Tx)] = E[xT([(X-u)(X-u)T]x)] = E[((xTI)x)] = E[xTx]
Finally, since we've already defined x to have only real values, xTx is therefore non-negative definite by definition.
matrix
First we will handle the diagonalizable case.Assume A is diagonalizable, A=VDV-1.Thus AT=(V-1)TDVT,and D= VT AT(V-1)T.Finally we have that A= VVT AT(V-1)TV-1, hence A is similar to ATwith matrix VVT.If A is not diagonalizable, then we must consider its Jordan canonical form,A=VJV-1, where J is block diagonal with Jordan blocks along the diagonal.Recall that a Jordan block of size m with eigenvalue at L is a mxm matrix having L along the diagonal and ones along the superdiagonal.A Jordan block is similar to its transpose via the permutation that has ones along the antidiagonal, and zeros elsewhere.With this in mind we proceed as in the diagonalizable case,AT=(V-1)TJTVT.There exists a block diagonal permutation matrix P such thatJT=PJPT, thus J=PTVT AT(V-1)TP.Finally we have that A= VPTVT AT(V-1)TPV-1, hence A is similar to ATwith matrix VPTVT.Q.E.D.
If the question is whether there is any proof, or even circumstantial evidence that Moses freed the Israelites from Egypt, the answer is a definite 'no'. In fact, a considerable and growing amount of evidence proves very much the opposite. There was no Exodus from Egypt as described in the Bible.
of Show, p. p. of Show.
There are many things the graph does not show. It does not show my shoe size, for example.
It is a biased estimator. S.R.S leads to a biased sample variance but i.i.d random sampling leads to a unbiased sample variance.
I think the answer is variance
that is not a ?
It is not possible to show that since it is not necessarily true.There is absolutely nothing in the information that is given in the question which implies that AB is not invertible.
show that SQUARE MATRIX THE LINEAR DEPENDENCE OF THE ROW VECTOR?
nope
Matrix
For small matrices the simplest way is to show that its determinant is not zero.
no. in the film the show him looking up.
matrix
matrix
"Matrix ping pong is definitely not an online game. It is a show in which, two Japanese people play ping pong, while moving in matrix like motions, thus making it matrix ping pong."