Use algrebra! If it has multiply chose, use algrebra backwards.
Chat with our AI personalities
First part of the question is 400 miles per hour
No. The two units are not comparable. Miles per hour is a speed. Knots per hour is an acceleration. However, I think the question was wrongly phrased and by knots per hour the question actually meant just knots (nautical miles per hour.) A nautical mile is longer than a mile: 1 nautical mile = ~1.15 miles. So 19 knots = 1.15 * 19 miles per hour = 21.85 mph. The answer is: Yes (if by knots/hr the question really meant knots) or No (if the question was initially correctly phrased.)
You must make a formula and convert the units to solve this problem. 65 miles per hour is a speed. 850 miles is a length. If you are travelling at 65 miles per hour, then you will have traveled 65 for every hour. At this point, it becomes a simple division problem. 850 miles covered at 65 miles per hour is 850 miles/65 miles/hour. 850/65 = ~13. The miles on the top and bottom of the fraction cancel out, and you are left with hours. So the time taken will be ~13 hours.
Assuming the question is refering to feet PER second and miles PER hour, 176 fps = 120 mph
1 km is a measure of distance, not speed. On the other hand, miles per hour is a measure of speed not distance. So there is a basic fault in the question.1 km = 0.621 milesand 1 km PER HOUR = 0.621 miles per hour