When you analyze a problem you look it over which is what analyzing means. You look over the problem and then you solve it. When you solve a problem you solve it and you use certain steps and solve it but of course everyone has there ways to solve a problem but some people have ways to solve it by just analysing it. That is the difference.
There is no such thing as "solving integers". You can solve an equation, which means finding all the unknowns in that equation, but you can't solve an integer.
It depends on the problem: you may have to use integer programming rather than linear programming.
NO!
I don't have a single clue... go on wikipedia to find out!
I can try...
It depends on the problem. An integer subtraction can be one number, take away another number.
The algorithms to solve an integer programming problem are either through heuristics (such as with ant colony optimization problems), branch and bound methods, or total unimodularity, which is often used in relaxing the integer bounds of the problem (however, this is usually not optimal or even feasible).
A fraction is not an integer.
It is: 1.50p+2.50p+3p = 7p when simplified
It is to use science for a practical job or to solve a problem.
You don't
When you analyze a problem you look it over which is what analyzing means. You look over the problem and then you solve it. When you solve a problem you solve it and you use certain steps and solve it but of course everyone has there ways to solve a problem but some people have ways to solve it by just analysing it. That is the difference.
Integer programming is a special kind of an optimising problem where the solution must be an integer.
There is no such thing as "solving integers". You can solve an equation, which means finding all the unknowns in that equation, but you can't solve an integer.
It depends on the problem: you may have to use integer programming rather than linear programming.
112 is an integer, not a fraction.