b -8
Not enough information to answer the question.
you can use it
To solve the above inequality equation it has to have an equality sign so that i group all the the knowns and the unknowns.
not always,sometimes you have to solve for x
Social class inequality
This is not an inequality. There is no <,>, or = sign.
Solve the inequality and enter your solution as an inequality comparing the variable to the solution. -33+x<-33
There is no equation not inequality. So there is nothing to solve!
The above is not an inequality as stated.
x>-9
I would not waste my time, because that's not an inequality.
There is no equation (nor inequality) so there is nothing to solve.There is no equation (nor inequality) so there is nothing to solve.There is no equation (nor inequality) so there is nothing to solve.There is no equation (nor inequality) so there is nothing to solve.
Washington Gladden believed that incorporating Christian teachings and principles into social and economic policies could help solve social problems. He believed that a combination of moral and legal solutions could address issues such as poverty, inequality, and injustice.
This isn't an inequality, but a mathematical "expression". In order to have an inequality that can be solved, there must be an inequality symbol between two mathematical expressions. Nancy
-9
b -8