2.666666666666667 or 2.667 should be sufficeintas it is 2 and 2/3rds
2/3 = 0.666667
.66666666 (it goes on forever)
2/3:= 2 ÷ 3= 0.6667 in decimal= 0.6667 * 100%= 66.67%
It is: 2/3 and then dividing the numerator of 2 by the denominator of 3 = 0.666 .... recurring 6
2.666666666666667 or 2.667 should be sufficeintas it is 2 and 2/3rds
2/3 = 0.666667
0.66666 repeating
.66666666 (it goes on forever)
2/3:= 2 ÷ 3= 0.6667 in decimal= 0.6667 * 100%= 66.67%
26/3
No, it is not. The 1 and 2/3rds changed to a decimal is 1.6666.... The 1.6666... is bigger than the 1.2 in the question. That means 1.2 is not bigger than 1 2/3rds.
Yes. A simple fraction, 1/2, can be the decimal of 0.5. And 2/3rds are equal, (by the angle if pointing on a trajectory pattern) is .2313352413001000200030.00
2/3rds of north Africa can read and write
It is: 2/3 and then dividing the numerator of 2 by the denominator of 3 = 0.666 .... recurring 6
1.0 pound
One and a 1/3