The question itself writes it acceptably, but it is better written as "2 hundredths" or "two hundredths", without the "one"; the word "hundredth" itself implies one hundredth.
To write sixty for hundredths in expanded form, you express it as (60/100). This can be further broken down to show the value of each digit: (60/100 = 0.60), which indicates that it represents 60 parts out of 100. In expanded form, it can be shown as (0.60 = 0.6 + 0.00).
745.00
Say it out loud. Fifty-six hundredths. Write it down. 56/100. Simplify it. 14/25
If 3.8 was rewritten to show tenths and hundredths?
30.20
Well, darling, to write 63 hundredths in decimal form, you simply write 0.63. It's as easy as pie. So go ahead, show off your decimal skills and impress your friends with your newfound knowledge.
No, it's impossible. If you did it with hundredths blocks then it would be fair.
no, it's impossible unless your using the hundredths place.
745.00
No, it's impossible. If you did it with hundredths blocks then it would be fair.
Say it out loud. Fifty-six hundredths. Write it down. 56/100. Simplify it. 14/25
0.05
If 3.8 was rewritten to show tenths and hundredths?
30.20
It is already at that, so it can be written as: 32.6 To show it as having a hundredths place specifically, though it won't change the value, it can be written as: 32.60
Write out the equation in words. The operators do not show in the question.
Oh, dude, 4 in 3.14 is like the best supporting actor in a movie. It's just there to add some flavor but not stealing the show. So, the value of 4 in 3.14 is 4, like, obviously. It's just hanging out in the hundredths place, doing its thing.