Roman numerals....
1 = I
2 = II
3 = III
4 = IV (or IIII on old clocks, watches and sundials)
5 = V
6 = VI
7 = VII
8 = VIII
9 = IX
10 = X
20 = XX
30 = XXX
40 = XL
50 = L
60 = LX
70 = LXX
80 = LXXX
90 = XC
100 = C
500 = D
1000 = M
2000 = MM
3000 = MMM
After 3000 thousand are written by either placing a horizontal bar over a numeral, to indicate that the numeral should be multiplied by 1000, or by placing the numeral inside brackets, which also indicates that it should be multiplied by 1000. Examples...
4000 = [IV]
10000 = [X]
523000 = [DXXIII]
1000000 = [M]
The numbers 11 - 19 and 21 - 29 etc follow the same pattern as the numbers 1 to 9 but preceeded by X or XX etc. The same applies to numbers preceeded by 100s or 1000s. Some examples...
14 = XIV
44 = XLIV
88 = LXXXVIII
151 = CLI
423 = CDXXIII
666 = DCLXVI
1066 = MLXVI
2009 = MMIX
108 = CVIII.Just google it and it would have come up!
Roman numerals can only go up to 4,999.
roman numerals only go up to 1000, which is M
on converting the Arabic number into roman numerals we get that 300 in roman numerals is written as : CCC as C=100.
Roman numerals really only go up to a million.
108 = CVIII.Just google it and it would have come up!
Roman numerals can only go up to 4,999.
roman numerals only go up to 1000, which is M
on converting the Arabic number into roman numerals we get that 300 in roman numerals is written as : CCC as C=100.
Roman numerals really only go up to a million.
CMXCIX Which is made up from M = 1000 C = 100 X = 10 I = 1 900 in roman numerals is CM - 100 before 1000 90 in roman numerals is XC - 10 before 100 9 in roman numerals is IX - 1 before 10
CXXXXV is not a correctly written Roman numeral. The individual numerals within it are real numerals but according to the rules of writing Roman numerals 'no numeral can be written more than three times in succession.' So, XXXX is not allowed. The numerals you have written add up to 145 and the correct Roman numeral for this is CXLV
The five letter word MIMIC can be formed from Roman numerals but as the individual numerals are in the wrong order it isn't a real Roman numeral.
IN 1777
It's 47 =)
Under the rules now governing the Roman numeral system that were set up in the Middle Ages long after the collapse of the Roman Empire the equivalent of 549 converted into Roman numerals is now considered to be DXLIX but the ancient Romans would have wrote it out simply as IDL which means 550-1 = 549
I would convert them back into Hindu-Arabic numerals, do the addition and then convert the answer to Roman numerals.