No, a 22 is not larger than a 223. In numerical terms, 223 is greater than 22. In the context of ammunition, .22 refers to a smaller caliber, while .223 indicates a larger caliber round. Thus, both in numerical value and in caliber size, 223 is larger than 22.
30% of 223= 30% * 223= 0.3 * 223= 66.9
512923 x 223 = 223 x 23..........223..........x23=======..........669......+ 446========........5129
round. so that they could spin fast
It is: 223 = CCXXIII
NO the .223 is a totaly diffrent round than the .223 WSSM
.223 inches in diameter, typically 45 to 55 grains for the .223 Remington, and 80 grains for the .223 Wylde.
No.
No
Very similar to, but not exactly the same as .223 Remington.
@ 18,500 feet
The round used by the military is the 5.56x45 round, not the commercial .223 Remington - although dimensionally similar, they are not identical. Some Designated Marksmen use it, but a dedicated sniper would not use it.
No. The two rounds are not interchangeable.
Yes, a .308 Winchester round is generally considered more powerful than a .223 Remington round. The .308 Winchester has a larger bullet, more powder behind it, and generally produces higher muzzle energy than a .223 round. However, the suitability of each round depends on the intended use and personal preference.
No, a 22 is not larger than a 223. In numerical terms, 223 is greater than 22. In the context of ammunition, .22 refers to a smaller caliber, while .223 indicates a larger caliber round. Thus, both in numerical value and in caliber size, 223 is larger than 22.
Yes
i am a round about