My answer does not pretend to be more than partial, I think there is a problem with identifying certain conceivable types of colourblindness, i.e. if a person has always seen every shade of what a 'normal' person believes to be red as blue and vice versa then they will call their blue red, their red blue, and there will be no way of recognising that when they say "it is blue" they are seeing red. However this is not exhaustive, if a person cannot appreciate the difference between green and yellow it will be obvious that their way of seeing colours is not equal to the standard, similarly if the 'colourblind' person sees certain shades of green as part of their brown colour family others will notice that their colourblind perception of what they experience is unequal to the colour consensus. As a footnote I must say that I believe the first question - of polar discrepancy - is much more interesting, how can can we know that another consciousness is using the words we seem to agree on to describe the same things as we are?
10%
They are the same.
The word "is" implies equality - an equation. An equality would be expressed different, for example, "is more than", "is at least", etc.
An algebraic expression is a collection of different terms that does not include an equality sign
integers: they are whole numbers which are not fractionsinequalities: they are different in size, cirumstances, degrees, lack of equality, etc.i got this from Google.com
No, the term "red-green colorblindness" means that you cannot tell the difference between red and green. There are several different types of colorblindness; red-green colorblindness is the most common kind. For example, another kind is blue-yellow colorblindness, where a person cannot tell the difference between blue and yellow. All types of colorblindness are much more common in men. See the Related Link below for the Wikipedia entry on colorblindness.
Colorblindness is usually a genetic trait. There is no more a cure for genetic colorblindness than there is for blond hair.
No you must not choose any diverse colorblindness
The proper name for colorblindness is color vision deficiency.
As of 2016 there is no cure or treatment for colorblindness.
Sex linked
Not necessarily. The allele for colorblindness is recessive. For a female, in order to be colorblind she must have to recessive alleles for colorblindness. Example: XcXc would be colorblind. XCXc would be a carrier for colorblindness, but not colorblind. For a male, because colorblindness is a sex-linked gene, he only needs one allele to be colorblind. Example: XcY is colorblind. XCY is not colorblind.
An atom is the smallest particle that is still recognisably the element
Can equality be achieved, I don't think so. Since there are so many different religions that all have different beliefs and practices, there is no possible way to reach religious equality. there is no such thing as equality.
no
Equality is everyone having the same rights, privileges and access. Diversity is the representation of a variety of different groups.
Colorblindness is characterized by not being able to tell apart two colors when they are the same value. Colorblindness is an x-linked trait, so it is much more common in males than females.