Nobody can know for sure, in advance, whether a certain team will win or lose.
Before you roll the cube it is an even. Afterwards, it is an outcome.
The answer depends on the probability of whatever it is that you are trying to observe and its variability. If the probability of a particular outcome is very high then you will need a lot of trials before you get one where the outcome does not occur. Conversely, a rare event will also require many trials. If there is a lot of random variation in the outcome of the trials, you will need more trials before you can be confident of the accuracy of any estimates.
That's a very complicated calculation, since it depends on so many variables that are difficult to evaluate or quantify. A few of the factors that would influence it are: -- whether or not you have a decision to make; -- how you go about considering the pros and cons, and exactly when you decide to leave the decision to chance, and to abide by the chance outcome; -- whether or not you have access to a coin at that moment; You would need to define your question a little more precisely before it would be possible to estimate an answer. For example, "what is the theoretical probability that any person anywhere on earth tosses a coin within the next one million years?" would give a very different estimated answer than if you asked, "what is the probability that a certain defined person tosses a coin within a defined five minute time span?" Or your question could be interpreted as to mean, "What are the possible outcomes when tossing a coin, and what is the theoretical probability of each outcome?"
The answer depends on how many cards are drawn and whether or not each is replaced before drawing the next card.The answer depends on how many cards are drawn and whether or not each is replaced before drawing the next card.The answer depends on how many cards are drawn and whether or not each is replaced before drawing the next card.The answer depends on how many cards are drawn and whether or not each is replaced before drawing the next card.
Whether or not the "and" events are independent.
He can't know the outcome before the game.
The expectation of the outcome of treatment is known as the prognosis.
Before you roll the cube it is an even. Afterwards, it is an outcome.
prognosisEmpiricalprognosis
Exactly one century before the last millennium was 900. This millennium started with 2001.
Execution by hanging is traditionally done before sunrise in Pakistan. No one knows exactly why this is done and whether it's based on Islamic law, practical reasons, or tradition.
Eye color has nothing to do with whether or not a person is better at drinking. It is more likely that a persons weight determines the outcome. In theory a smaller person would most likely be drunk before a bigger person.
Leading and lagging factors can be measured by comparing their impact on a specific outcome or goal over time. Leading factors are variables that change before the outcome, while lagging factors change after the outcome. By analyzing the correlation between these factors and the outcome, you can determine their level of influence and measure their effect on the desired outcome.
Both sides were peaceful again, just how they were before the war!
The challenge comes before any penalty is assessed. That is due to the fact that, in your question, the offense would not know whether to accept the penalty if they don't know what the outcome of the play is. So what would happen would be A) the referee will accept the other team's challenge, B) make a ruling to the final outcome of the play after looking at the replay (completed or incompleted pass), and then the offense will decide whether or not to accept the penalty.
Exactly what it says. Before you jump anywhere you look.
Whether your alternate hypothesis is directional (one-sided) or non-directional (two-sided) is largely up to you but must be determined before you conduct your experiment, not after. It's not defined by the outcome.