None, unless you count the boundaries ... 30 is an even whole number.
No because the nearest whole number is 30
When rounding a number to the nearest whole number, you look at the digit immediately to the right of the decimal point. In this case, the number 30 is already a whole number, so it does not need to be rounded. Therefore, 30 rounded to the nearest whole number remains 30.
43 to the nearest whole number
No and yes. No because in some circumstances you have to have a whole number. And yes because it does divide into it because it comes out as a fraction.
None, unless you count the boundaries ... 30 is an even whole number.
30 because there are 10 tenths in each whole number ok dumbo
No because the nearest whole number is 30
When rounding a number to the nearest whole number, you look at the digit immediately to the right of the decimal point. In this case, the number 30 is already a whole number, so it does not need to be rounded. Therefore, 30 rounded to the nearest whole number remains 30.
43 to the nearest whole number
Let the unknown number be n.Then 20 + n = 30 : Subtract 20 from both sides gives :-20 - 20 + n = 30 - 20 : n = 10
No and yes. No because in some circumstances you have to have a whole number. And yes because it does divide into it because it comes out as a fraction.
It is: (20+30)/2 = 25
it is a whole number, it has two digits, it is not a prime number, it is positive, 4 months have this many days
Thirty is the whole number in the decimal 30.92. If you want to round to the nearest whole number, it would be 31.
It is both.
It is 30.