answersLogoWhite

0

The Elstad and Seibert cases both addressed the issue of police interrogation and the admissibility of confessions in relation to the Miranda rights. In Elstad, the Supreme Court ruled that a confession obtained after a suspect had not been Mirandized could still be admissible if subsequent statements were made after proper warnings. Similarly, in Seibert, the Court examined the validity of a two-step interrogation technique that circumvented Miranda requirements. Both cases highlight the complexities of ensuring that confessions are not coerced and the importance of procedural safeguards in protecting a suspect's rights.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1w ago

What else can I help you with?