cumulative percentage = (cumulative frequency ÷ n) x 100
No, cumulative is not a compound word.
Cumulative shares are when the shares are combined and then evenly distributed to the share holders. Non cumulative preference shares are when they go to certain people first.
Given a frequency table,the first cumulative frequency is the same as the first frequency;the second cumulative frequency is the sum of the first cumulative frequency and the second [ordinary] frequency;the third cumulative frequency is the sum of the second cumulative frequency and the third [ordinary] frequency;and so on.An alternative definition is that the cumulative frequency for any value is the sum of all the frequencies less than or equal to that value.
Cumulative risks are risks that increase with each added risk.
jhdghk
You just need to add up the frequency total one by one to find the cumulative frequency of a certain set of data.
a voting system used to elect a single winner
The main advantage of cumulative voting is that it disperses the power to elect directors among shareholders, instead of concentrating the power in the majority shareholder. This can be helpful in a number of situations, especially when the corporation is forming and a significant (but not majority) investor wants some assurance that she will have some power over the board. Another (possible) advantage (depending on which side you're on), is that it makes it more difficult to remove directors, because a director can't be removed under cumulative voting if the votes cast against removal would have been enough to elect the director. Thus, a majority vote won't be sufficient to remove a director. This is another benefit for the minority shareholders, who may be weary about the majority's control.
I'd think democracy. The people are the ones choosing/voting.
No, mandatory voting would never work in the United States.
Voting in a booth would be an example of a secret ballot.
cumulative percentage = (cumulative frequency ÷ n) x 100
The cumulative frequency or the probability of an observed value being less than or equal to a given value. By extension, it would also give the probability of a greater value being observed.
How would you define a subtancebased on what you have obsrved
How would you define a subtancebased on what you have obsrved
To educate women who would be voting