Ya put it on a triple beam balance amd you should know what to do from there
No. It cannot be. Mass cannot be measured in cm3, which is a measure of volume.
Grams
no
no
i would use kilograms
Each sugar granule has the mass (space) the granule occupies. Collectively, when in a 2kg bag of sugar, the mass is more obvious. Obviously, it would be difficult to measure a single granule (but not impossible).
It would be slightly less than 4 cups of sugar. You should measure weight when baking! Cups is a measure of volume. Pounds is a measure of weight and mass. You can not directly convert the two.
Those are two different things. Mass of a sugar packet . . . gram might be best. Capacity or volume of a sugar packet . . . cubic centimeter might be best.
A good estimate would be about 20 but that is not exact. Cups is a measure of volume. Pounds is a measure of weight and mass. You can not directly convert the two.
No. It cannot be. Mass cannot be measured in cm3, which is a measure of volume.
It would be closer to 2 pounds. You should measure weight when baking! Cups is a measure of volume. Pounds is a measure of weight and mass. You can not directly convert the two.
A good estimate would be 2 cups. Cups is a measure of volume. Pounds is a measure of weight and mass. You can not directly convert the two.
mass of a substance or an object
poundA newton
You would use the unit of measure called "kilograms" to measure the mass of an elephant.
It would be close to 2 cups. You should measure weight when baking! Cups is a measure of volume. Pounds is a measure of weight and mass. You can not directly convert the two.
It would be just under 2 cups. You should measure weight when baking! Cups is a measure of volume. Pounds is a measure of weight and mass. You can not directly convert the two.