answersLogoWhite

0

I am rational, but not a number. This statement is therefore half correct.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

Can the conditional statement be written as a biconditional statement?

No, because the reverse statement may not result in a true statement.(A) If x is an integer then x*x is rational.(B) if x*x is rational then x is an integer.(B) is utter nonsense. x can be any rational number of even a square root of a rational number, for example, sqrt(2/3), and x*x will be rational.


What number will produce a rational number when multiplied by 0.5?

Any and every rational number.


What best describes a number which results from dividing a rational number by zero?

You can't divide by zero.


What describes the quotient of a nonzero rational number and an irrational number?

The quotient of a nonzero rational number and an irrational number is always an irrational number. This is because dividing a rational number (which can be expressed as a fraction of integers) by an irrational number cannot result in a fraction that can be simplified to a rational form. Therefore, the result remains outside the realm of rational numbers.


Which statement is true Converting an integer to a fraction shows whether it is rational A negative fraction is never rational An integer numerator over a zero denominator is never rational?

Statement 1 is true but totally unnecessary. As integer is always a rational and you do not need to convert it to a fraction to determine whether or not it is rational. A negative fraction is can be rational or irrational. The fact that it is negative is irrelevant to its rationality. An integer number over a zero denominator is not defined and so cannot be rational or irrational or anything. It just isn't.

Related Questions

Which Term Best Describes the number 0.5?

rational


Can the conditional statement be written as a biconditional statement?

No, because the reverse statement may not result in a true statement.(A) If x is an integer then x*x is rational.(B) if x*x is rational then x is an integer.(B) is utter nonsense. x can be any rational number of even a square root of a rational number, for example, sqrt(2/3), and x*x will be rational.


What number will produce a rational number when multiplied by 0.5?

Any and every rational number.


an integer is always a rational number, but a rational number is not always an integer. Provide an example to show that this statement is true?

Integers are counting numbers or include them. 1/2 is a rational number that is not a couinting number.


What best describes a number which results from dividing a rational number by zero?

You can't divide by zero.


What type of number best describes the diameter of the circle?

A positive real number. It can be irrational or rational, even integer.


What type of number best describes the diameter of a circle?

A positive real number. It can be irrational or rational, even integer.


A rational number is a number that can be written as a .?

If the decimal expansion of a number either repeats or terminates, it's rational. I'm not quite sure how to mangle that statement to make it fit into your sentence, but you should do at least SOME of your homework yourself anyway.


Is 3.456 a rational or irrational number?

It is a rational number. It can be written as a fraction.


Every natural number is an irrational number?

Close. But to make that statement correct, three letters must be deleted:Every natural number is a[n ir]rational number.


What type of number best describes 0.9 which is 3 times 0.3?

It is a rational number because it can be expressed as a fraction in the form of 9/10


Is the product of a rational number and a rational number a rational number?

yes