Oh, dude, like, totally! So, to check if a number is a multiple of 4, you just need to see if it's divisible by 4 without any remainder. And guess what? 58 is not divisible by 4 because if you divide 58 by 4, you get 14 with a remainder of 2. So, in short, 58 is not a multiple of 4.
58
-57 298 - 89 = 209 209 - 80 = 129 129 - 71 = 58 58 - 62 = -4 -4 - 53 = -57 notice every number is subtracted by 9 less than the previous number's subtrator
At each step the number being subtracted is reduced by 9 298 - 89 = 209 209 - 80 = 129 129 - 71 = 58 58 - 62 = -4 -4 - 53 = -57..........which is the next number.
an integer is a whole number eg 4, 58 not 3.2
4*(n + 2)
-6
A certain number increased by 4
7x + 3 is your answer, as we don’t have enough information to fully solve this problem.
Oh, dude, like, totally! So, to check if a number is a multiple of 4, you just need to see if it's divisible by 4 without any remainder. And guess what? 58 is not divisible by 4 because if you divide 58 by 4, you get 14 with a remainder of 2. So, in short, 58 is not a multiple of 4.
increased means added to so a certain increased by 4 would be x + 4
-1 Here is why: let x be the number, 4x+7=3 4x=3-7=-4 so 4x=-1 and x is -1
58
58
A square number is the product of a number and itself. 16 is square; it is the product of 4 and 4; 4 times 4.
58 electrons because the number of electrons is the same number of protons [] [] () (---------------------)
-57 298 - 89 = 209 209 - 80 = 129 129 - 71 = 58 58 - 62 = -4 -4 - 53 = -57 notice every number is subtracted by 9 less than the previous number's subtrator