It’s no
No
No, the converse of the statement "If I am hungry then I am not happy" is "If I am not happy then I am hungry." While the original statement is assumed to be true, its converse does not necessarily follow that truth. The truth of the original statement does not guarantee the truth of its converse; there could be other reasons for not being happy that do not involve hunger.
they always have seconds
2 syllables are in hungry
Oh, dude, clocks don't get hungry. They're not like us, constantly thinking about food. Clocks just tick away, telling time without a care in the world. So, if your worksheet is asking how you know when to wind a clock, it's probably about maintenance, not feeding time.
No
No
No
No. In fact, it cannot be true.
The Answer: NO
No, the converse of a statement does not necessarily have to be true. In this case, the original statement "If you are hungry then you are not happy" does not imply that its converse "If you are not happy then you must be hungry" is always true. It is possible to be unhappy for reasons other than hunger.
Ralph assumed the role of chief to start out with after he was elected by the other boys. Jack was always power hungry and eventually started his own "tribe" in which he was the chief.
hungry things
Winnie-the-Pooh is always hungry for honey
"I'm not really hungry" can imply that the person is actually hungry.
get fat, fast
no wolves are not allways hungry.They are not as hungry as sharks.