In The writer simply states a fact about a character
Chat with our AI personalities
41.15 IS a rational number. The fact that it is expressed as a decimal does not mean it is not rational. As a ratio, it can be written as 4115/100. You may simplify that ratio if you so wish
1.25 IS a rational number. The fact that it is expressed as a terminating decimal does not mean it is not rational. As a ratio, it can be written as 125/100. You may simplify that ratio if you so wish.
When talking about dimensions in characters you first have to define those dimensions as they do not come by assumption. There are many dimensions to characters and you first have to set what it is you are talking about before you proceed. If you have ever seen the TV show 'Ancients Behaving Badly' this is exactly what they do. So let us consider a character such as Ebenezer Scrooge. What two dimensions shall we discuss? How about thriftiness and friendliness. Thriftiness: Scrooge is very thrifty. In fact he is so thrifty you could say he was miserly. In fact he is so miserly you might be tempt to say that it is a consuming obsession with him. Friendliness: Scrooge is not friendly. In fact you would be tempted to say that Scrooge is hostile. In fact you could say that Scrooge is anxiously hostile, seems to take pleasure in his hostility.
Two-Dimensional Characters are also called as flat/static/minor characters. It is a minor character in a work of fiction who does not undergo substantial change or growth in the course of a story. It plays a supporting role to the main character. They are often necessary in a story, along with Main characters. Take, for example, Mr. Collins in Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice. As flat character, he serves a vital role in the story of how Elizabeth and Darcy get together, and he provides comedy, but his character stays essentially unchanged. (In fact, that's part of what makes him funny.)
This question has no answer because you cannot convert meters to inches per minute.However,If the question were, "How can you convert 4.5 meters per second to inches per minute", then the process to arrive at this answer would be:4.5 * meters/second * inches/meter * seconds/minuteOne inch is the same as 2.54cm; so, we can use this fact to determine how many inches are in a meter.100cm/(2.54cm/inch) ~ 39.3701 inchesThere are 60 seconds in a minute.We now have all of the numbers we need ...The number we get is 4.5 * 39.3701 * 60 ~ 10629.93The unit we get ismeters/second * inches/meter * seconds/minute(simplify meters) -> 1/second * inches/1 * seconds/minute(simplify seconds) -> 1/1 * inches/1 * 1/minute(simplify numbers) -> inches/1 * 1/minute(simplify expression) -> inches/minuteThe full answer would then be ~10629.93 inches/minute