There is no such number since the two sets are the same.
It is not an irrational number. Otherwise, it belongs to each of the sets listed above.
Equivalent sets are sets with exactly the same number of elements.
Here are a few: An integer is a counting number, or a whole number. If you have a negative counting number, zero, or a positive counting number, you have an integer, and any integer will be a member of one of those three sets of numbers. Zero is the only integer that is neither positive or negative. Each integer (except zero) has a compliment with an opposite sign.
Integers are sets of numbers that have the positive and the negative whole numbers.. Since 35 is a whole number, -35 is an integer
the greatest number that is an integer and rational number but is not a natural or whole number is -1
No, they are not equivalent sets.
they are almost all equivalent - whole numbers also have the number 0, which natural numbers (counting numbers) do not.
There is no such number since the two sets are the same.
Equivalent sets are sets with exactly the same number of elements.
It is not an irrational number. Otherwise, it belongs to each of the sets listed above.
Equivalent sets are sets with exactly the same number of elements.
It is a whole number, integer, and a rational number. :D
T, The set of integer geater than requal to negative five
It is an integer, a rational, a real, a complex number. It is the additive identity for all of the above sets.
Complex numbers, Real numbers, Rational numbers, Integers, Natural Numbers, Multiples of an integer.
Oh, dude, -6 belongs to a few different sets of numbers. It's a whole number, an integer, a rational number, and a real number. So, like, it's basically part of the big happy family of numbers.