It is rational and it is an integer.
Every integer is a rational number.
Integers are rational. So is this, but it's not an integer.
A rational number which is an integer can be simplified to a form in which the denominator is 1. That is not possible for a rational number which is not an integer.
It is rational but not an integer.
Since 95 is positive, its square root is real. Only negative numbers have non-real square roots. That leaves the question of whether it is rational or irrational. An integer's square root can only be rational if it is itself an integer. But 95 is not a perfect square, so it's square root is not an integer. Therefore the square root is irrational.
It is rational and it is an integer.
It is a rational number, not an integer.
A rational number which is an integer can be simplified to a form in which the denominator is 1. That is not possible for a rational number which is not an integer.
Every integer is a rational number.
It is not an integer but is a rational number.
Integers are rational. So is this, but it's not an integer.
A rational number which is an integer can be simplified to a form in which the denominator is 1. That is not possible for a rational number which is not an integer.
A rational number.
3.4 is rational.
It is rational but not an integer.
Yes -10 is an integer and a rational number