No
28 is an integer and it is rather pointless to write it as a fraction but, if you must, the simplest form is 28/1.28 is an integer and it is rather pointless to write it as a fraction but, if you must, the simplest form is 28/1.28 is an integer and it is rather pointless to write it as a fraction but, if you must, the simplest form is 28/1.28 is an integer and it is rather pointless to write it as a fraction but, if you must, the simplest form is 28/1.
To the nearest integer, 28.
Simply multiply 28 by any integer, and you get a multiple of 28.
To find the integer that, when increased by -12, equals 28, we can set up the equation: ( x + (-12) = 28 ). Simplifying this gives ( x - 12 = 28 ). Adding 12 to both sides, we find ( x = 28 + 12 ), which results in ( x = 40 ). Therefore, the integer is 40.
-3 and -25
Yes, 28 is an integer.
No, it is not.
28 is an integer and it is rather pointless to write it as a fraction but, if you must, the simplest form is 28/1.28 is an integer and it is rather pointless to write it as a fraction but, if you must, the simplest form is 28/1.28 is an integer and it is rather pointless to write it as a fraction but, if you must, the simplest form is 28/1.28 is an integer and it is rather pointless to write it as a fraction but, if you must, the simplest form is 28/1.
No
28 is an integer, and there is no sensible way to represent it as a fraction.
the largest integer of distinct power is 28
The answer is 27 since 27 itself is an integer.
To the nearest integer, 28.
No, it is not.
16 (16+12=28)
28
Simply multiply 28 by any integer, and you get a multiple of 28.