No
28 is an integer and it is rather pointless to write it as a fraction but, if you must, the simplest form is 28/1.28 is an integer and it is rather pointless to write it as a fraction but, if you must, the simplest form is 28/1.28 is an integer and it is rather pointless to write it as a fraction but, if you must, the simplest form is 28/1.28 is an integer and it is rather pointless to write it as a fraction but, if you must, the simplest form is 28/1.
To the nearest integer, 28.
Simply multiply 28 by any integer, and you get a multiple of 28.
To find the integer that, when increased by -12, equals 28, we can set up the equation: ( x + (-12) = 28 ). Simplifying this gives ( x - 12 = 28 ). Adding 12 to both sides, we find ( x = 28 + 12 ), which results in ( x = 40 ). Therefore, the integer is 40.
To the nearest integer, 28 To the nearest ten, 30
Yes, 28 is an integer.
No, it is not.
28 is an integer and it is rather pointless to write it as a fraction but, if you must, the simplest form is 28/1.28 is an integer and it is rather pointless to write it as a fraction but, if you must, the simplest form is 28/1.28 is an integer and it is rather pointless to write it as a fraction but, if you must, the simplest form is 28/1.28 is an integer and it is rather pointless to write it as a fraction but, if you must, the simplest form is 28/1.
No
28 is an integer, and there is no sensible way to represent it as a fraction.
the largest integer of distinct power is 28
The answer is 27 since 27 itself is an integer.
To the nearest integer, 28.
No, it is not.
16 (16+12=28)
Simply multiply 28 by any integer, and you get a multiple of 28.
28