Yes. Also, the square root of 5.3 is an irrational number. And the square root of negative 5.3 is an imaginary number. :D Hope that helps a bit.
53/10
No.
No, 5.3 is not an irrational number; it is a rational number. Rational numbers can be expressed as a fraction of two integers, and 5.3 can be written as 53/10. Therefore, since it can be represented as a fraction, it is classified as rational.
No, 5.87 repeating (written as 5.877777...) is not an irrational number; it is a rational number. A rational number can be expressed as the ratio of two integers, and since 5.87 repeating can be represented as the fraction 53/9, it qualifies as rational. In contrast, irrational numbers cannot be expressed as simple fractions.
As much as, in these days of uncertainty, anything can be anything. As long as the constraints of a rational number are kept to, a rational number will always remain a rational number.
No, because 53 is a rational number that can be expressed as a fraction in the form of 53/1
53/10
No.
Irrational
No, 5.3 is not an irrational number; it is a rational number. Rational numbers can be expressed as a fraction of two integers, and 5.3 can be written as 53/10. Therefore, since it can be represented as a fraction, it is classified as rational.
Square root of 53 is simlipfied in decimal form as √53 = 7.280. Square root of 53 cannot be expressed as a fraction in the form p/q which tells us that the square root of 53 is an irrational number.
No, 5.87 repeating (written as 5.877777...) is not an irrational number; it is a rational number. A rational number can be expressed as the ratio of two integers, and since 5.87 repeating can be represented as the fraction 53/9, it qualifies as rational. In contrast, irrational numbers cannot be expressed as simple fractions.
It is a rational number. It can be written as a fraction.
yes
Is 12.05 a rational number or irrational number?
1.96 is a rational number
It is a rational number, as it can be written as a fraction.