No. All integers are rational numbers.
As much as, in these days of uncertainty, anything can be anything. As long as the constraints of a rational number are kept to, a rational number will always remain a rational number.
Yes.
Yes, but only if the rational number is 0.
Only if the rational number is 0.
No. All integers are rational numbers.
No 132 is not a square number because every number up to 132 times its self does not equal 132 and a square number is a number that is a multiple of 1 number times itself so 132 is not a square number.
It is a rational number. It can be written as a fraction.
yes
132 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as 132/1. You can then calculate equivalent rational fractions if you multiply both, its numerator and denominator, by any non-zero integer.
Is 12.05 a rational number or irrational number?
1.96 is a rational number
It is a rational number, as it can be written as a fraction.
Yes, the sum is always rational.
There is no such thing as a number that is both rational and irrational. By definition, every number is either rational or irrational.
As much as, in these days of uncertainty, anything can be anything. As long as the constraints of a rational number are kept to, a rational number will always remain a rational number.
Yes, it is.