"Statistically significant" means that the result is beyond the element of chance.
A result is statistically significant if:it is unlikely to have occurred by chance
No, it is not.
There is nothing particularly significant about a sample size of 30.
This question lacks the details to make any judgement.
"Statistically significant" means that the result is beyond the element of chance.
A result is statistically significant if:it is unlikely to have occurred by chance
No, it is not.
if it is unlikely to have happened by chance
No. However, the difference between them can be.
A number, by itself, cannot be statistically significant. It is necessary to know what the underlying statistical distribution for that number is. That information can be obtained from knowledge of the statistical test being carried out.
You buy a thousand lottery tickets (different numbers) and win nothing. That is statistically significant because the chances of that happening purely by chance are pretty slim. But if the lottery is operated properly, the result is not practically significant. There is nothing that can be done. Tough!
There is nothing particularly significant about a sample size of 30.
This question lacks the details to make any judgement.
There are 5 significant digits in number 14500. To count for a given number as to how many significant digits does it have, look for the first zero form left and decimal point. For ex sample 0045 has 2 significant digits 0.0045 has 2 significant digits 0.4500 has 4 significant digits.
Yes!
Those that are statistically significant.