The number 0.12131415... is a non-terminating decimal that appears to continue indefinitely with a pattern of consecutive integers (12, 13, 14, 15, etc.). Since it does not repeat and does not terminate, it is classified as an irrational number. Rational numbers, by definition, can be expressed as a fraction of two integers, which 0.12131415... cannot be. Therefore, 0.12131415... is not a rational number.
If it would never end, then it is irrational e.g. 10/3 = 3.33333333... etc.. if it ends it's rational e.g. 1000/8 = 125 other irrational numbers: pi, e
No, it is rational.
It is rational. It is rational. It is rational. It is rational.
"Rational" is an adjective and so there cannot be "a rational" (and certainly not "an rational"). Any answer would depend on whether the question was about a rational number, a rational person, a rational argument or "a rational" combined with some other noun.
It is rational.
If it would never end, then it is irrational e.g. 10/3 = 3.33333333... etc.. if it ends it's rational e.g. 1000/8 = 125 other irrational numbers: pi, e
Rational
1.14 is rational.
4.6 is rational.
No, it is rational.
It is rational. It is rational. It is rational. It is rational.
It is a rational number
No, it is rational.
Rational.
It is rational
0.38 is a rational number because it can be expressed as a fraction
It it is rational because you can put it as a