With the small sample provided, it doesn't look as if it is repeating. The problem, however, lies in the "and so forth"; it is not clear what rule you use to write the decimal digits, and depending on what exactly that rule is, it may, or may not, be a repeating decimal. To be "repeating", and therefore a rational number, after a while the same group of digits has to repeat over and over, without end.
no, there are no elipses so it doesn't go on forever, therefore, not a repeating decimal
No, because repeating decimals never stop repeating, so it would be impossible to have a different number that does not repeat.
0.1818
Not necessarily. Remember that the definition of an irrational number is a number that can't be expressed as a simple fraction. 2/3, for example, is rational by that definition even though its decimal form is a repeating decimal. Since irrational numbers cannot be written as fractions, they don't have fraction forms. So basically, numbers with repeating decimals are considered rational. Irrational numbers don't have repeating decimals.
Well, of course your input is 54/117. Your exact result is 6/13. The decimal approximation is just a very large decimal number. But the repeating decimal is 0.461538 repeating, so over the numbers '461538', there should be a line over them. Your percentage is 46.15%. :)
Any terminating decimal is rational. So are repeating (periodic) decimals.Any terminating decimal is rational. So are repeating (periodic) decimals.Any terminating decimal is rational. So are repeating (periodic) decimals.Any terminating decimal is rational. So are repeating (periodic) decimals.
no, there are no elipses so it doesn't go on forever, therefore, not a repeating decimal
No, because repeating decimals never stop repeating, so it would be impossible to have a different number that does not repeat.
No a repeating decimal is a decimal like 2/3, which is .6666666666 and so on.
A repeating decimal is a decimal number in which a digit or a sequence of digits repeats infinitely. Whether a repeating decimal is greater than a non-repeating decimal depends on the specific values of the decimals in question. In some cases, a repeating decimal can be greater than a non-repeating decimal, while in other cases, it can be less than. Comparing the magnitudes of repeating and non-repeating decimals requires careful analysis of their patterns and values.
4111 is an integer and so there is no sensible way to convert it into a repeating decimal.
A terminating decimal reaches an end after a finite number of digits whereas a repeating decimal, after a finite number of digits, has a string of decimals (also of finite length) that repeats forever. Thus 1.2356 is a terminating decimal. 1.456333... is a repeating decimal with the digit 3 repeating an infinite number of times. So also is 23.56142857142857...... where the string 142857 repeats to infinity. In fact, terminating decimals may be viewed as repeating decimals with zero repeating infinitely.
0.1818
Yes. Any terminating decimal is a rational number. Any repeating decimal also.
1/6 as a decimal is 0.1666 repeating percent. So what you need to do is move the decimal point over twice to the right and you get the percent, 16.66 repeating %.
Well, honey, a repeating decimal is just a fancy way of saying a number that goes on forever, like a bad date that won't end. So technically, yes, a repeating decimal is bigger than a normal decimal because it has more digits that keep repeating. But hey, don't stress about it too much, math is like a puzzle - sometimes you just gotta roll with it and hope for the best.
6/1/ = 6/18 as a fraction - which can be simplified, if you so desire. The decimal is 0.33... (repeating).