0
The number 1.010010001... is not a rational number because it is a non-repeating, non-terminating decimal. Rational numbers can be expressed as the quotient of two integers, but this decimal continues indefinitely without repeating a specific pattern. Therefore, it cannot be represented as a simple fraction.
What else can I help you with?
Is 48 rational or irrational?
No, it is rational.
Is the negative square root of nine rational or irrational?
It is rational. It is rational. It is rational. It is rational.
What is an rational?
"Rational" is an adjective and so there cannot be "a rational" (and certainly not "an rational"). Any answer would depend on whether the question was about a rational number, a rational person, a rational argument or "a rational" combined with some other noun.
Is the number 5 rational or irrational?
It is rational.
Is 54 a irrational or a rational number?
It is rational.
Is 0.2020020002 a rational number?
That terminating decimal 0.2020020002 is a rational number and is: 2020020002/10000000000 = 1010010001/5000000000 If you mean a non-terminating decimal 0.2020020002.... where each 2 is followed by one more zero than the previous 2 then it is not a rational number.
Is 0.34343434 rational or irrational?
Rational
Is 1.14 is irrational or rational?
1.14 is rational.
Is 4.6 irrational or rational?
4.6 is rational.
Is 48 rational or irrational?
No, it is rational.
Is 12.67 rational or irrational?
It is a rational number
Is the negative square root of nine rational or irrational?
It is rational. It is rational. It is rational. It is rational.
Is 0.682 a rational or irrational?
No, it is rational.
Is 6 rational or irrational?
Rational.
Is 4.83 rational or irrational?
It is rational
Is 0.38 rational or irrational?
0.38 is a rational number because it can be expressed as a fraction
Is 3.46 rational or irrational?
It it is rational because you can put it as a
