No. 1.68 is not a natural number or a whole number.
"Natural" numbers are the counting numbers . . . one, two, three, four . . .
1.68 is not one of them.
"Whole" numbers are the integers . . . the natural numbers, their negatives, and zero.
1.68 isn't one of those either.
About all you can say for 1.68 is that it's positive, it's mixed, and it's rational.
To the nearest whole number, 168
Any of its factors
Yes, a natural number is always a whole number.for ex- 1 is a natural no. And is a whole no. Too.in fact every natural no. Is a whole no.
55
0 is whole no but not a natural no.
Yes.
To the nearest whole number, 168
Yes.
Any of its factors
Yes, a natural number is always a whole number.for ex- 1 is a natural no. And is a whole no. Too.in fact every natural no. Is a whole no.
55
To express 168 as a decimal, you simply write it as 168.0. In decimal form, whole numbers are represented with a decimal point and a zero after it to indicate that there are no decimal fractions. Therefore, 168 as a decimal is 168.0.
0 is whole no but not a natural no.
The ratio, in simplest form, is 3.
168.
Yes, all natural numbers are whole numbers.
No. All natural numbers are whole numbers.