i have no idea your just going to have to go back to Google for some other website that knows the answer.
No, it isn't divisible by either
129 is divisible by: 1 3 43 129.
129 is divisible by 1 3 43 and 129.
You can tell a number is divisible by 3 when the sum of its digits is equal to 3 or a multiple of three. In this instance, 1 + 2 + 9 = 12/3 = 4, therefore 129 is divisible by 3.
Yes. 1 + 2 + 9 = 12 12 is divisible by 3. If the sum of the digits of a number are divisible by 3, then the whole number is divisible by 3. 129 is a composite number because it divisible by a factor other than 1 and itself.
No, it isn't divisible by either
387 is divisible by: 1 3 9 43 129 and 387.
129 is divisible by 3. 1+2+9=12 and 12 is divisible by 3. That is the rule of divisibility by 3.
129 is divisible by: 1 3 43 129.
129 is divisible by 1 3 43 and 129.
You can tell a number is divisible by 3 when the sum of its digits is equal to 3 or a multiple of three. In this instance, 1 + 2 + 9 = 12/3 = 4, therefore 129 is divisible by 3.
Yes. 1 + 2 + 9 = 12 12 is divisible by 3. If the sum of the digits of a number are divisible by 3, then the whole number is divisible by 3. 129 is a composite number because it divisible by a factor other than 1 and itself.
Yes. 129/43=3
No. 1,000 is not evenly divisible by 129.
Yes - 129/3 = 43
3 or 129.1, 3, 43, 129
3.