It is irrational. 133 = 7*17 and so is not the square of any rational number. Therefore its square root cannot be rational.
the square root of 17 is not a perfect square, so it can't be reduced to a rational number. √17 ≈ 4.1231 but the decimal place keeps going on forever
No because the square root of any prime number is irrational inasmuch that it can't be expressed as a fraction.
√17 is irrational
There is no square root of -289 because it is an imaginary number but the square root of 289 is 17
It is irrational. 133 = 7*17 and so is not the square of any rational number. Therefore its square root cannot be rational.
17 is a prime number with no factors other than itself and 1 therefore minus square root of 17 is an irrational number.
the square root of 17 is not a perfect square, so it can't be reduced to a rational number. √17 ≈ 4.1231 but the decimal place keeps going on forever
square root of 9 = 3 but 2, 17 and 23 are irrational numbers
No because the square root of any prime number is irrational inasmuch that it can't be expressed as a fraction.
No.
Yes. Sort of. Actually, a positive square root has two distinct solutions, Therefore, sqrt(289) is technically two rational numbers, 17 and -17.
√17 is irrational
irrational
The square root of 17 is not a rational number so it can only be approximated in fraction form. Sqrt(17) = 4.1231 (approx) = 41231/10000 which is a fraction in its simplest form.
irrational
The square root of 289 is 17 since 172 or 17 * 17 = 289