The only difference between Synvisc and Synvisc One is the dosing protocol. Synvisc is a series of three injections, smaller amounts given over three weeks, while Synvisc One is one dose - equivalent to the volume of the three Synvisc injections. Therefore, no difference in efficacy is anticipated.
The fuel injection is not getting gas. Fix or buy a new fuel injection pumb.
I Think Decimals Are Better Than Fractions
No, Dirt 3 is better than Dirt 1.
Of course inter is better!!
The only difference between Synvisc and Synvisc One is the dosing protocol. Synvisc is a series of three injections, smaller amounts given over three weeks, while Synvisc One is one dose - equivalent to the volume of the three Synvisc injections. Therefore, no difference in efficacy is anticipated.
uhh. I wouldn't do either o__0
The word electronic is used to describe that the fuel injection is controlled by electronics, while multi-point injection is indicative of multiple injectors placed just upstream of each cylinder's intake valve. All modern fuel injection today is done electronically (the only reason people use the term electronic fuel injection is because it sounds better than single-point fuel injection.)
Fsi stands for Fuel Stratified Injection, in which petrol is injected directly into the cylinders, they do better than a conventional engine with fuel injection into the intake ports, as it gives a higher output of power with less fuel usage.
Fsi stands for Fuel Stratified Injection, in which petrol is injected directly into the cylinders, they do better than a conventional engine with fuel injection into the intake ports, as it gives a higher output of power with less fuel usage.
Change the intake manifold and fuel pump. Install the carb, and you're done. I'd recommend against the swap if there isn't anything seriously wrong with the fuel injection though. Electronic fuel injection (especially port injection like the 88 Camaro has) is superior to carburetors in every conceivable way. Better performance, better mileage, etc. If you are building up the engine, you would be better off remapping the fuel table of the EFI to match what you have done to the engine than you would be bolting a carb on it.
Sort of, you see the 89 Jeeps had Throttle body injection. This differs from actual fuel injection because instead of injecting into the intake prior to the valve, it injects fuel into the throttle body through just one injector instead of multiple injectors. Better than a carburetor, but not quite as good as injection as far as fuel economy is concerned.
It is possible. However, depending on the difficulty of the extraction, an injection may be preferable (less painful, safer) than not having the injection.
An intravenous injection goes directly to the blood stream and its action is faster than the other types of injection.
There is more than one injection method: 1. I.V. drip 2. Intravenous Injection 3. Subcutaneous (under the skin) 4. Intra-muscular.
Yes. Definitely. But if they are heavy and long enough to be worrying about, ask a doctor or call in center. Better to be safe rather than sorry.
Personally, I don't think so, and I tend to be turned off from Kimber by their use of metal injection molding (i.e., cast) parts in their internals.