Wiki User
β 7y agoWiki User
β 8y agoNo because it is not a whole number
It is four.
37 is an integer and there is not much sense in expressing it as a fraction. But, if you must, it could be written as 37/1.
37
Dividing 37 by 8 does not give an integer result - it is equal to 4.625.
6
No.
No! An integer I believe is any whole number. That can be 400 or -400. 37 or -37. this guy does not know what he is talking about no offense yes it does!
It is four.
37 is an integer and there is not much sense in expressing it as a fraction. But, if you must, it could be written as 37/1.
37
37*512 is an integer, not a fraction.
Dividing 37 by 8 does not give an integer result - it is equal to 4.625.
6
37 is an integer and so already rounded to a greater degree than required.
Let x = first integer2nd integer = x + 13rd integer = x + 2x + (x +1) + (x + 2) = x - 713x + 3 = x - 713x = x - 742x = -74x = -371st Integer = -372nd Integer = -363rd Integer = -35(-37) + (-36) + (-35) = -108-108 + 71 = -37
The positive integer factors of 1961 are: 1, 37, 53, 1961
The positive integer factors of 185 are: 1, 5, 37, 185