It is four.
37 is an integer and there is not much sense in expressing it as a fraction. But, if you must, it could be written as 37/1.
37
Dividing 37 by 8 does not give an integer result - it is equal to 4.625.
6
No.
It is four.
37 is an integer and there is not much sense in expressing it as a fraction. But, if you must, it could be written as 37/1.
No! An integer I believe is any whole number. That can be 400 or -400. 37 or -37. this guy does not know what he is talking about no offense yes it does!
37
37*512 is an integer, not a fraction.
Dividing 37 by 8 does not give an integer result - it is equal to 4.625.
6
37 is an integer and so already rounded to a greater degree than required.
Let x = first integer2nd integer = x + 13rd integer = x + 2x + (x +1) + (x + 2) = x - 713x + 3 = x - 713x = x - 742x = -74x = -371st Integer = -372nd Integer = -363rd Integer = -35(-37) + (-36) + (-35) = -108-108 + 71 = -37
The positive integer factors of 1961 are: 1, 37, 53, 1961
The positive integer factors of 703 are: 1, 19, 37, 703