Yes. It's the ratio of 38,765 to 10,000 .
Every decimal that ends and doesn't go on forever is a rational number.
Another contributor enlarged:
More specifically, a rational number is defined as a number that can be expressed as the division of two integers, where the divisor is not zero.
To which the first contributor responded:
I think that's what I said. But in any case, both of us need to be reminded that
the question was "Is it?", to which either "yes" or "no" is a complete answer.
Writing a number in standard form simply means to express the number in its 'normal' form. Therefore, your example is written in standard form as: 38,765
As much as, in these days of uncertainty, anything can be anything. As long as the constraints of a rational number are kept to, a rational number will always remain a rational number.
Yes.
Yes, but only if the rational number is 0.
Only if the rational number is 0.
Writing a number in standard form simply means to express the number in its 'normal' form. Therefore, your example is written in standard form as: 38,765
It is a rational number. It can be written as a fraction.
yes
38765 million people lived in china
Is 12.05 a rational number or irrational number?
1.96 is a rational number
It is a rational number, as it can be written as a fraction.
Yes, the sum is always rational.
There is no such thing as a number that is both rational and irrational. By definition, every number is either rational or irrational.
As much as, in these days of uncertainty, anything can be anything. As long as the constraints of a rational number are kept to, a rational number will always remain a rational number.
Yes, it is.
10.01 is a rational number