The term statistically valid means a study is able to draw conclusions that are in agreement with statistical and scientific laws. This relies on mathematical and statistical laws.
A scientific theory is a hypothesis that has been repeatedly tested and still seems to be valid. These theories are tested by using the scientific method.
Bias in a scientific investigation usually comes in the form of wanting a particular result. This can skew with the process, doing things that an objective experiment would never do, such as only choose certain results as valid.
An invalid argument is when the facts you are using are invalid or your forms of defense are wrong or incorrect, a valid argument is the opposite of an invalid argument. "There is a windmill in my beard. your argument is invalid." (This is a good example of a bad contradiction)
Defining powers this way makes the laws of powers continue being valid, for fractional exponents. Mainly, as you might know, (ab)c = abc. For positive integers "b" and "c", this is easy to visualize. Now, for example, for (21/2)2, you would expect the result to be 2 according to this law. This is only possible if 21/2 is equal to the square root of 2.
No, the scientific method can be uncontrolled to for it to be valid.
No valid scientific statistical data exists.
Bifidobacterium is a valid scientific name of a genus of bacteria. In total there are over 25 species within the genus of Bifidobacterium. An example is Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, which is ofen used in probiotic yoghurts.
this is the final or proven hypothesis
when it is consistent with observation
No, a single colon in itself is not a valid example of CSS syntax.
No; it is not testable.
its to old
It is to old
to make sure its valid
50.31.30.25
No it does not, but it pretends to to make you think that what it is saying is valid.