No single digit determines divisibility by 3.
No.
Yes. answer is 236
To determine if a number is divisible by 3, you can add up the digits of the number and check if the sum is divisible by 3. For 313, the sum of the digits is 3+1+3=7, which is not divisible by 3. For 351, the sum of the digits is 3+5+1=9, which is divisible by 3. Therefore, 351 is divisible by 3, but 313 is not.
No, it is not divisible by 3 Alternative answer Yes it is divisible by 3 but not to a whole number 705,220 divided by 3 = 235073.333333r e.g. three people won £705.220 on the lottery, if they divided the money equally they would each get £235,073.33
To determine what number makes 371 divisible by 3, we need to sum the digits of 371: 3 + 7 + 1 = 11. To be divisible by 3, the sum of the digits must also be divisible by 3. Since 11 is not divisible by 3, we need to find the number that, when added to 11, results in a sum divisible by 3. The next multiple of 3 greater than 11 is 12, so the number that makes 371 divisible by 3 is 1.
The multiples of 371 (which are infinite) are all divisible by 371, including these: 371, 742, 1113, 1484, 1855, 2226 . . .
No single digit determines divisibility by 3.
371 is divisible by 1, 7, 53, 371.
53
No.
No, its not able to divide equally
Yes. answer is 236
No because it will have a remainder
No - 614/3 = 204.6 recurring (that is, 204.6666...)
Yes: 471 / 3 = 157
855 and 875 are both evenly divisible by 5. 855 is evenly divisible by 3, but 875 isn't.