Yes, 2 and 3 are consecutive prime numbers.
There is no such thing as "a consecutive number", so the answer must be "No".
let largest number be x, other numbers are x-1,x-2 (since they are consecutive) now, it says x+(x-1) + (x-2)= 18 = 3x -3=18 = 3x= 18+3 = 3x= 21 = x= 21/3 = x= 7 therefore largest number is 7.
21 and 22 are the first pair.It can be proven that, given any number n, there are sequences of n consecutive composite numbers.
2 and 3
21 and 22 are consecutive composite numbers.
For this particular problem, you just need to experiment a little. 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 +6 = 21 (6 integers).
21/4 is not a whole number and it cannot be represented as consecutive whole numbers.
4 and 3 * * * * * 19 is itself a whole number and no whole number can lie between two consecutive whole numbers.
20 and 21
Yes, 2 and 3 are consecutive prime numbers.
There is no such thing as "a consecutive number", so the answer must be "No".
19, 20 and 21.
let largest number be x, other numbers are x-1,x-2 (since they are consecutive) now, it says x+(x-1) + (x-2)= 18 = 3x -3=18 = 3x= 18+3 = 3x= 21 = x= 21/3 = x= 7 therefore largest number is 7.
19, 20, 21
21 and 22 are the first pair.It can be proven that, given any number n, there are sequences of n consecutive composite numbers.
The pattern in the sequence 0, 3, 9, 21 involves adding consecutive odd numbers. Starting with 0, then adding 1+2, 3+6, and 9+12 gives you the next number in the sequence. Therefore, the next number would be 21 + 15 = 36.