1, 2, 4, yes. The rest, no.
89/2 gives 44 and a remainder of 1 and so 89 is not a multiple of 2
Assuming that "fiths" is your way of spelling fifths, the answer is 44/1.
No, since 11 is less than 44 it can not be a multiple, as it is defined (basically) as a number achievable by multiplying the base number by some integer. e.x.: 22 is a multiple of 11 ( 11 x 2 = 22 ). 44 is a multiple of 11 ( 11 x 4 = 44 ). 11 is not a multiple of 44 ( 44 x 1/4 = 11) since 1/4 is not an integer.
4! + 2*[sq(1) + sq(3)] = 24 + 2*(1 + 9) = 24 + 2*10 = 24+20 = 44
Among the whole numbers alone, 10 is a multiple of 1, 2, 5, and 10. It's also a multiple of an infinite number of fractions and decimals.
Least Common Multiple (LCM) for 2 44 is 44.
89/2 gives 44 and a remainder of 1 and so 89 is not a multiple of 2
Assuming that "fiths" is your way of spelling fifths, the answer is 44/1.
Least Common Multiple (LCM) for 2 44 is 44.
No, since 11 is less than 44 it can not be a multiple, as it is defined (basically) as a number achievable by multiplying the base number by some integer. e.x.: 22 is a multiple of 11 ( 11 x 2 = 22 ). 44 is a multiple of 11 ( 11 x 4 = 44 ). 11 is not a multiple of 44 ( 44 x 1/4 = 11) since 1/4 is not an integer.
The factors of 20 are: 1, 2, 4, 5, 10, 20 The factors of 44 are: 1, 2, 4, 11, 22, 44
The LCM is: 44
10 is a multiple of 1, 2 and 5 from the given numbers
The factors of 40 are: 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 10, 20, 40 The factors of 44 are: 1, 2, 4, 11, 22, 44
The least common multiple of 4 , 44 and 32 is 352.
4! + 2*[sq(1) + sq(3)] = 24 + 2*(1 + 9) = 24 + 2*10 = 24+20 = 44
10 2*5 = 10 5*2 = 10 1*10 = 10