44.49 is more precise than 44.5 but less precise than 44.491 - The larger a number becomes the more precise it is.
Yes.
The smallest one - but it makes sense only if you have means of measuring to that precision. Also, more precise is not the same as more appropriate. For example, a micrometre is more precise than a kilometre (by a factor of one billion) but if it makes no sense at all to measure the distance between two cities in micrometres! Or, a microgram is more precise than a kilogram (again by a factor of a billion), but it makes no sense to measure my mass in micrograms. My mass will increase by more than that after I've had a mug of coffee!
In and of themselves, 1/4 and 1/6 are equally precise. Used as units of measurement, distances measured to 1/6 of an inch are more precise than to 1/4 of an inch.
3.20m is more precise than 3.2m.
44.49 is more precise than 44.5 but less precise than 44.491 - The larger a number becomes the more precise it is.
Yes.
NO
Yes.
Millimetres would allow for more precision than decimetre. If you can measure a smaller quantity, this always allows you to be more precise and accurate.
mm is more precise than dm. 100 mm is 1 dm.
Your calculations can be more precise, but the final result should be rounded, to avoid giving the impression that it is more exact than is justified by the measurements.
No.
A graduated cylinder is typically more precise than a beaker because it has measurement markings with smaller increments, allowing for more accurate volume readings. Beakers are generally used more for approximate measurements and mixing rather than precise volume measurements.
it uses more precise vocabulary
No, it is a more precise procedure than that.
It is.