Yes, 55 is a rational number because it can be expressed as a fraction, specifically ( \frac{55}{1} ). Rational numbers are defined as numbers that can be written as the ratio of two integers, and since 55 is an integer, it meets this criterion.
No, 55 degrees is not a number, it is a measurement: of an angle or temperature or academic qualifications, or power of a polynomial et cetera.55, on the other hand, is a rational number..
Irrational.
Yes because it can be expressed as a fraction in the form of 11/2
No, it's a rational number. It's the ratio of 55/100, or 11/20. (They're the same.)
0.55 is a fraction. It is a fraction in decimal form rather than in the form of a ratio. However, that does not stop it being a fraction. And, being a decimal, there is no simpler form. Its rational equivalent is 55/100 which can be simplified to 11/20.
No, 55 degrees is not a number, it is a measurement: of an angle or temperature or academic qualifications, or power of a polynomial et cetera.55, on the other hand, is a rational number..
5.5 is rational because it can be expressed as a ratio of two integers, e.g. 11/2.
27.5 is a rational number because it can be expressed as a fraction in the form of 55/2
Yes. It's the ratio of 55 to 100.
I don’t know
Irrational.
27.5 is a rational number because it can be expressed as a fraction in the form of 55/2
It is irrational
5.5 is a fraction. It is a fraction in decimal form rather than in the form of a ratio. However, that does not stop it being a fraction. Its equivalent, in rational form, is 55/10. You can simplify this rational fraction if you require.
Yes because it can be expressed as a fraction in the form of 11/2
No, it's a rational number. It's the ratio of 55/100, or 11/20. (They're the same.)
55 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as 55/1 which cannot be simplified. A decimal number is simply a way of representing a number so that the place value of each digit is ten times that of the one to its right. So the decimal here is 55, exactly as in the question.