Yes, 599422 is divisible by 3. The sum of its digits is 5+9+9+4+2+2 = 31, which is divisible by 3.
If the question is "or", yes it is. If the question is "and", no it is not.
No, both are divisible by 2.No, both are divisible by 2.No, both are divisible by 2.No, both are divisible by 2.
no.. for example 6,12,18 are divisible by 2..but not divisible by 8.
416 is divisible by 2 but is not divisible by 3.
1, 2, 299711, 599422.
Yes, 599422 is divisible by 3. The sum of its digits is 5+9+9+4+2+2 = 31, which is divisible by 3.
If the question is "or", yes it is. If the question is "and", no it is not.
1, 2, 299711, 599422
1, 2, 299711 and 599422.
No, both are divisible by 2.No, both are divisible by 2.No, both are divisible by 2.No, both are divisible by 2.
351 is not divisible by 2. 2 is not divisible by 351.
2 is not divisible by 19008. 19008 is divisible by 2.
2 is not divisible by 972. 972 is divisible by 2.
2 is not divisible by 870. 870 is divisible by 2.
Of course not ! The answer is right within your question: 2 is divisible by 2 but 2 is not divisible by ... (can you dig it ?)
no.. for example 6,12,18 are divisible by 2..but not divisible by 8.