No, 600 2 is not the expanded form of 632. The expanded form of a number breaks it down into the sum of its place values. For 632, the correct expanded form is 600 + 30 + 2, which shows the value of each digit based on its position. The expression 600 2 does not accurately represent the number 632.
901,613 in expanded form
8000+600
The expanded form is 1000000 + 300000 + 2000 + 600 + 70
100000 + 70000 + 600
The expanded form of 658.129 is 600 + 50 + 8 + 0.1 + 0.02 + 0.009.
600 in expanded form is 100+100+100+100+100+100
901,613 in expanded form
8000+600
The expanded form is 1000000 + 300000 + 2000 + 600 + 70
49602 in expanded form is 40,000+9,000+600+2
608 in expanded form= 600+8 example: 46729= 40000+6000+700+20+9
100000 + 70000 + 600
An expanded form is like 145,624 divided into like 100,000+40,000+5,000+600+20+4 and that is how you do expanded form
The expanded form of 658.129 is 600 + 50 + 8 + 0.1 + 0.02 + 0.009.
600+2 IS the expanded form! The regular form is 602.
600 + 30 + 9
Well, let's take a moment to look at this happy little math problem. When we say 600 plus 2, we're talking about 600 ones and 2 ones, which gives us 602. The expanded form of 632 would be 600 + 30 + 2, which equals 632. Just remember, math is like painting a beautiful picture - take it one step at a time and enjoy the process!