73 is a whole number (an integer).
As all integers are rational, 73 is rational.
The first number is 0, the additive identity for the set of numbers. The second, 73 is a positive integer or counting number and the third, 38.5 is a decimal representation of a rational number.
73 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as 73/1 which cannot be simplified.
As much as, in these days of uncertainty, anything can be anything. As long as the constraints of a rational number are kept to, a rational number will always remain a rational number.
Yes.
Yes, but only if the rational number is 0.
The first number is 0, the additive identity for the set of numbers. The second, 73 is a positive integer or counting number and the third, 38.5 is a decimal representation of a rational number.
73 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as 73/1 which cannot be simplified.
It is a rational number. It can be written as a fraction.
yes
Is 12.05 a rational number or irrational number?
1.96 is a rational number
It is a rational number, as it can be written as a fraction.
Yes, the sum is always rational.
There is no such thing as a number that is both rational and irrational. By definition, every number is either rational or irrational.
As much as, in these days of uncertainty, anything can be anything. As long as the constraints of a rational number are kept to, a rational number will always remain a rational number.
Yes, it is.
10.01 is Rational. IRRATIONAL are those decimals, which recur to infinity and there is NO regular order in the decimal digits. pi = 3.141592..... is Irrational But 3.333333..... is rational , because the decimal digits are in a regular order. Definitely an irrational number cannot be converted into a rational number/ratio/fraction/quotient. So 10.01 is rational because it can be converted to a ratio/fraction/quotient of 10 1/100 or 1001/100