No it is not.
Chat with our AI personalities
28.6
No, 325 is not a perfect square however 324 is a perfect square.
38 is not a perfect square. Its square root is a fraction and the square root of a perfect square is always an integer.
No- the closest perfect squares are 36 (perfect square of 6) and 49 (perfect square of 7)
It is the square of an integer: that is what a perfect square is.
818 is not a perfect square, so the number that gives you 818 when squared will not be an integer.818 = 2 * 409 (409 is prime)282 = 784x2 = 818292 = 841x = √(818)x ≈ 28.6007
28.6
estimated to be 818 per square mile
200 is not a perfect square. Its square root is a fraction and the square root of a perfect square is always an integer.
No, 325 is not a perfect square however 324 is a perfect square.
A perfect square is a square of an integer (a whole number).
30 is not a perfect square. Its square root is a fraction and the square root of a perfect square is always an integer.
500 is not a perfect square. Its square root is a fraction and the square root of a perfect square is always an integer.
38 is not a perfect square. Its square root is a fraction and the square root of a perfect square is always an integer.
154 is a not perfect square.
No- the closest perfect squares are 36 (perfect square of 6) and 49 (perfect square of 7)
12.9 seconds t=square root of 2d divided by g t=time d=distance g=gravitational constant 9.8 m/s square so.... t=square root of 2(818) divided by square root of 9.8=12.92047.......