No
No, they are not.
96 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as 96/1. This is the simplest form.
No, it is rational.
It is rational. It is rational. It is rational. It is rational.
Yes because it can be expressed as a fraction
No
I don’t know
No, they are not.
96 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as 96/1. This is the simplest form.
-9.6 is a negative, real, mixed number. It's the ratio of -96 to 10, so it's rational.
48 is rational. It can be written as a/b where a and b are integers and b is not = 0 It is written as 84/1 or 96/2. It is also a terminating/repeating decimal. (In this case, terminating decimal). Real numbers can only be rational or irrational, not both. Therefore it is only rational, not rational and irrational. b.t.w. It is also a natural number, whole number, integer, rational number, real number and complex number.
Rational
1.14 is rational.
The number -3 is a rational number. A rational number is any number that can be expressed as a fraction where the numerator and denominator are integers and the denominator is not zero. In this case, -3 can be expressed as the fraction -3/1. Since -3 can be expressed as a ratio of two integers, it is considered a rational number.
4.6 is rational.
No, it is rational.